Backdating scandals second

Posted by / 13-Nov-2019 17:33

If a company grants options on June 1 (when the stock price is 0), but backdates the options to May 15 (when the price was ) in order to make the option grants more favorable to the grantees, the fact remains that the grants were actually made on June 1, and if the exercise price of the granted options is , not 0, it is below fair market value.Thus, backdating can be misleading to shareholders in the sense that it results in option grants that are more favorable than the shareholders approved in adopting the stock option plan.This is not always the case, according to a ruling by federal judge William Alsup of the U. District Court for the Northern District of California.

This is a way of repricing options to make them valuable or more valuable when the option "strike price" (the fixed price at which the owner of the option can purchase stock) is fixed to the stock price at the date the option was granted.

Wiley Online Library requires cookies for authentication and use of other site features; therefore, cookies must be enabled to browse the site.

Detailed information on how Wiley uses cookies can be found in our Privacy Policy.

For instance, public companies generally grant stock options in accordance with a formal stock option plan approved by shareholders at an annual meeting.

Many companies' stock option plans provide that stock options must be granted at an exercise price no lower than fair market value on the date of the option grant.

backdating scandals second-39backdating scandals second-6backdating scandals second-21

One thought on “backdating scandals second”