Carbon dating falacy
has anybody of importance taken into account that the craters on the moon are not indicative of imperfect trajectory for seemingly all of its marks????
no trails, as if every single collision it has was heading at a perfect 90 degree angle?
A fallacy is a deceptive argument that appears to be logically valid but is in fact invalid.The Arctic ice may be melting, but the Antarctic has been cooling for 30 years and the sea ice there is growing, so the decline in Arctic sea ice does not indicate a global problem. In any previous generation, the fatuous cascade of fallacious arguments deployed by climate extremists in government, academe and the media in support of the now-collapsed climate scare would have been laughed down.“Monckton says he’s a member of the House of Lords, but the Clerk of the Parliaments says he isn’t, so everything he says is nonsense.” That is the the attack on the man rather than on his argument. When the future British prime minister Harold Macmillan arrived at Oxford to study the classics, his tutor said: “Four years’ study will qualify you for nothing at all – except to recognize rot when you hear it.” The climate storyline is rot.Its conclusion will be unreliable at best, downright false at worst.One should not make the mistake of thinking that Aristotle’s fallacies are irrelevant archaisms.
“Ah,” say the believers, “but there is a consensus of scientists and learned societies.” That is the the reputation or appeal-to-authority fallacy.